Exploring Math Moments: Middle-schoolers’ Phases of Problem-solving, Executive Functions in Practice, and Collaborative Problem Solving
Main Article Content
Abstract
Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has been shown to both engage and benefit students’ learning of mathematics. However, there is evidence that group work is not always easy to facilitate, in part because educators lack details about learners’ engagement during group work: the processes of problem solving involved, and how these are engaged. In this exploratory study, we focused on these processes in the moments of related math activity, or math moments, engaged by two groups of interested, urban, middle-school aged students during four sessions of work in the Virtual Math Teams (VMT) environment. We examined three phases of their problem solving: Exploring, Constructing, and Checking. In addition, to further describe the students’ cognitive and behavioral engagement, we considered both the process of students' use of executive functions (EF), during problem solving, termed executive functions in practice (EFP), as well as the stage of CPS (Participation, Cooperation, and Collaboration), during phases of problem solving. We learned that the relation between each phase of problem solving, categories of EFP, and stages of CPS vary; for example, the problem-solving phase of Exploring was found to have a more positive effect on EFP and CPS than either Constructing or Checking. Implications for educational practice, and next steps for related research are described.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Andrews-Todd, J., & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025
Bailey, B. A., Andrzejewski, S. K., Greif, S. M., Svingos, A. M., & Heaton, S. C. (2018). The role of executive functioning and academic achievement in the academic self-concept of children and adolescents referred for neuropsychological assessment. Children, 5(7), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/children5070083
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
Bishara, S., & Kaplan, S. (2022). Inhibitory control, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievements in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 69(3), 868–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1925878
Boaler, J., & Selling, S. K. (2017). Psychological imprisonment or intellectual freedom? A longitudinal study of contrasting school mathematics approaches and their impact on adults' lives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0078
Bonotto, C. (2005). How informal out-of-school mathematics can help students make sense of formal in-school mathematics: The case of multiplying by decimal numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(4), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0704_3
Brookman-Byrne, A., Mareschal, D., Tolmie, A. K., & Dumontheil, I. (2018). Inhibitory control and counterintuitive science and maths reasoning in adolescence. PLoS One, 13(6), e0198973-e0198973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198973
Caviola, S., Colling, L. J., Mammarella, I. C., & Szűcs, D. (2020). Predictors of mathematics in primary school: Magnitude comparison, verbal and spatial working memory measures. Developmental Science, 23(6), e12957. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12957
Cervera-Crespo, T., & González-Alvarez, J. (2017). Age and semantic inhibition measured by the Hayling Task: A meta-analysis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw088
Chan, R. C., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T., & Chen, E. Y. (2008). Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019672
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2011). High school-- geometry. Common core state standards for mathematics, https://www.thecorestandards.org/Math/Content/HSG/
Cook, C. R., Thayer, A. J., Fiat, A., & Sullivan, M. (2020). Interventions to enhance affective engagement. In A. L. Reschly, A. J. Pohl, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school (pp. 203–237). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_12
Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.00
deVilliers, M. (2003). Rethinking proof with the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005
Dietrich, J., Schmiedek, F., & Moeller, J. (2022). Academic motivation and emotions are experienced in learning situations, so let’s study them. Introduction to the special issue. Learning and Instruction, 81, 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101623
Dong, A., Jong, M. S. Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 591203-591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., Anjewierden, A., Bollen, L., Sikken, J., & de Jong, T. (2019). Improving the quality of vocational students’ collaboration and knowledge acquisition through instruction and joint reflection. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09296-0
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gathercole, S. E., Lamont, E., & Alloway, T. P. (2006). Working memory in the classroom. In S.J. Pickering (Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 219–240). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012554465-8/50010-7
Gerson, H. (2008). David's understanding of functions and periodicity. School Science and Mathematics, 108(1), 28–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17937.x
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65-84). Routledge.
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2005). Advanced mathematical thinking at any age: Its nature and development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0701_3
Hill, C. E. (Ed.) (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Kapur, M., & Hamstra, M. (2018). Learning through problem solving. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 210–220). Routledge.
Huizinga, M., Smidts, D. P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014). Change of mind: Cognitive flexibility in the classroom. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40(2), 31–35.
Jacques, S., & Zelazo, P. (2001). The Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST): A measure of executive function in preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(3), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1207/875656401753549807
Jeong, H., Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2017). Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9256-8
Jose, R. G., Samuel, A. S., & Isabel, M. M. (2020). Neuropsychology of executive functions in patients with focal lesion in the prefrontal cortex: A systematic review. Brain and Cognition, 146, 105633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105633
Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2
Kasmer, L., & Kim, O. K. (2011). Using prediction to promote mathematical understanding and reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 111(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00056.x
Kelton, M. L., Ma, J. Y., Rawlings, C., Rhodehamel, B., Saraniero, P., & Nemirovsky, R. (2018). Family meshworks: Children’s geographies and collective ambulatory sense-making in an immersive mathematics exhibition. Children's Geographies, 16(5), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1495314
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. R. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y
Kuhn, D., Capon, N., & Lai, H. (2020). Talking about group (but not individual) process aids group performance. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09321-7
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Laureiro‐Martínez, D., & Brusoni, S. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1031–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2774
Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843
Letang, M., Citron, P., Garbarg‐Chenon, J., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2021). Bridging the gap between the lab and the classroom: An online citizen scientific research project with teachers aiming at improving inhibitory control of school‐age children. Mind, Brain and Education, 15(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12272
Lieber, L., & Graulich, N. (2020). Thinking in alternatives–A task design for challenging students’ problem-solving approaches in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3731–3738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00248
Long, B., Spencer-Smith, M. M., Jacobs, R., Mackay, M., Leventer, R., Barnes, C., & Anderson, V. (2011). Executive function following child stroke: The impact of lesion location. Journal of Child Neurology, 26(3), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073810380049
Mann, T. D., Hund, A. M., Hesson‐McInnis, M. S., & Roman, Z. J. (2017). Pathways to school readiness: Executive functioning predicts academic and social–emotional aspects of school readiness. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12134
Marek, L. I., Brock, D.-J. P., & Savla, J. (2015). Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: Conceptualization and measurement. The American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014531068
McCoy, D. C. (2019). Measuring young children’s executive function and self-regulation in classrooms and other real-world settings. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00285-1
Melzner, N., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2020). Regulating self-organized collaborative learning: The importance of homogeneous problem perception, immediacy and intensity of strategy use. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09323-5
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.2167/le678.0
Mohammadhasani, N., & Asadi, S. (2020). The investigation of the effect of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment and dynamic mathematics software on trigonometric problem solving skill. Technology of Education Journal, 14(4), 867–875. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2020.5964.2312
Moulton, B. R. (1986). Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. Journal of Econometrics, 32(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90021-7
Nolen, S. B. (2020). A situative turn in the conversation on motivation theories. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101866
Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., & Ward, C. J. (2015). Situating motivation. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075399
Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079
Phelps, E., & Damon, W. (1989). Problem solving with equals: Peer collaboration as a context for learning mathematics and spatial concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.639
Pohl, A. J. (2020). Strategies and interventions for promoting cognitive engagement. In A. L. Reschly, A. J. Pohl, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school (pp. 253-280). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_14
Pollastri, A. R., Epstein, L. D., Heath, G. H., & Ablon, J. S. (2013). The collaborative problem solving approach: Outcomes across settings. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 21(4), 188–199. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24651507/
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
Ponitz, C. C., McClelland, M. M., Matthews, J. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). A structured observation of behavioral self-regulation and its contribution to kindergarten outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015365
Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2006). Memory retrieval and interference: Working memory issues. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.001
Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students’ learning about fractions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0846-8
Ray-Riek, M. (2013). Powerful problem solving: Activities for sense-making with the mathematical practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
Renningr, K. A., Corven, J., De Dios, M.C., Hogan, M. R., Kyaw, M.H., Michels, A.G., Nakayama, M., Werneck, H., & Yared, F. (manuscript in preparation). Collaborative problem solving and executive functions in middle-schoolers’ work in the Virtual Math Teams environment.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge.
Rogat, T., Hmelo-Silver, C., Cheng, B., Traynor, A., Adeoye, T., Gomoll, A., & Downing, B. (2022). A multidimensional framework of collaborative groups’ disciplinary engagement. Frontline Learning Research, 10(2), 1–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1369028
Romero-López, M., Pichardo, M. C., Bembibre-Serrano, J., & García-Berbén, T. (2020). Promoting social competence in preschool with an executive functions program conducted by teachers. Sustainability, 12(11), 4408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114408
Salmela‐Aro, K., Upadyaya, K., Cumsille, P., Lavonen, J., Avalos, B., & Eccles, J. (2021). Momentary task-values and expectations predict engagement in science among Finnish and Chilean secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12719
Salminen-Saari J. F. A., Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Haataja, E., Toivanen, M., Hannula, M. S., & Laine, A. (2021). Phases of collaborative mathematical problem solving and joint attention: A case study utilizing mobile gaze tracking. ZDM Math Education, 53(4), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01280-z).
Sankaranarayanan, R., Kwon, K., & Cho, Y. (2021). Exploring the differences between individuals and groups during the problem-solving process: The collective working-memory effect and the role of collaborative interactions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 32(1), 43–66. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-80316-002
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). On paradigms and methods: What do you do when the ones you know don't do what you want them to? Issues in the analysis of data in the form of videotapes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 179-214. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_3
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Siegler, R. S. (1998). Emerging minds. Oxford University Press.
Skaguerlund, K., Bolt, T., Nomi, J. S., Skagenholt, M., Västfjäll, D., Träff, U., & Uddin, L. Q. (2019). Disentangling mathematics from executive functions by investigating unique functional connectivity patterns predictive of mathematics ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(4), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01367
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Stahl, G. (2013). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02200-5
Straub, S., & Rummel, N. (2021). Promoting regulation of equal participation in online collaboration by combining a group awareness tool and adaptive prompts. But does it even matter? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(3), 67–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09340-y
Su, Y., Li, Y., Hu, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Exploring college English language learners’ self and social regulation of learning during wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9269-y
Sun, J., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T. J., Morris, J. A., Miller, B. W., Ma, S., Nguyen-Jaheil, K. T., & Scott, T. (2022). Children’s engagement during collaborative learning and direct instruction through the lens of participant structure. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 69, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102061
Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471
Symonds, J. E., Kaplan, A., Upadyaya, K., Salmela-Aro, K., Torsney, B., Skinner, E. & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Momentary engagement as a complex dynamic system. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fuy7p
Symonds, J. E., Schreiber, J. B., & Torsney, B. M. (2019). Silver linings and storm clouds: Divergent profiles of student momentary engagement emerge in response to the same task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000605
van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Woltjer, G., & Kirschner, P. (2011). Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3
van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
Vandenberg, J., Zakaria, Z., Tsan, J., Iwanski, A., Lynch, C., Boyer, K. E., & Wiebe, E. (2021). Prompting collaborative and exploratory discourse: An epistemic network analysis study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(3), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09349-3
Veraksa, A., Bukhalenkova, D., & Almazova, O. (2020). Executive functions and quality of classroom interactions in kindergarten among 5-6-year-old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 603776–603776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603776
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 137(4), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013170
Viterbori, P., Traverso, L., & Usai, M. C. (2017). The role of executive function in arithmetic problem-solving processes: A study of third graders. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(5), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1392307
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2019). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009
Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pieper, S. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: A meta-analytical study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004
Younger, J., O'Laughlin, K., Anguera, J., Bunge, S., Ferrer, E., Hoeft, F. Mccandliss, B., Mishra, J., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Gazzaley, A., & Uncapher, M. (2023). Better together: Novel methods for measuring and modeling development of executive function diversity while accounting for unity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1195013
Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of group experience and information distribution on collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 47(5), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09495-0
Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wen, Y., Chen, H., Gao, Q., & Wang, Q. (2021). Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09339-5