Analyzing teachers’ scripts from teachers’ reflections after they tried to encourage students’ flexible mathematical thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Teachers play a key role in promoting flexible mathematical thinking in society. There is a growing need to develop better methods for both pre- and in-service teacher training, but not enough is so far understood about what knowledge and skills teachers use in practical teaching situations. The means for investigating this are few. A new analytic framework was developed using abductive content analysis to investigate signs of script restructuring and construction as they appear in teachers' written reflections reporting their experiences in applying novel methods in their classrooms. Scripts are mental knowledge structures combining formal professional knowledge and the knowledge teachers use in practical situations with representations, assessments, and predictions of different classroom events. Scripts enable teachers to make (rapid) snap decisions to structure their teaching and manage classrooms to facilitate students' attention towards objectives, activities, and information that support learning. In this multiple case qualitative study, six teachers enrolled on the “Flexible and Adaptive Arithmetic Skills in Primary School” course, part of the JoMa (Towards Flexible Mathematics) in-service training program, teaching assignment and end-of-course reflections were investigated in depth. The goal was to advance the application of script theory to the study of teachers' actions and thinking as they engage in teaching intended to promote flexible mathematical thinking. The results suggest that signs of script restructuring and construction can be investigated post-hoc from textual accounts, scripts may have a considerable influence on teachers’ actions and thinking, and by engaging in teaching practice in real-life settings and reflecting on these accumulating experiences, processes leading to script development may be initiated. The results suggest that the analytic framework developed is functional and robust, paving the way for future investigations with larger samples. This study provided a more profound understanding of how online in-service education can support teachers to develop scripts supporting their competences to teach mathematical flexibility.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Ball, D. L., Hill, H.C., & Bass, H. (2005). Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough to Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide? American Educator 29, (1): 14-17, 20-22, 43-46
Blömeke, S. (2017). Modelling teachers’ professional competence as a multi-dimensional construct. In Guerriero, S. (ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, OECD Publishing, pp. 119–135 https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-7-en
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher Education Effectiveness: Quality and Equity of Future Primary Teachers’ Mathematics and Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110386798
Boaler, J. (2019). Developing Mathematical Mindsets: The Need to Interact with Numbers Flexibly and Conceptually. American Educator, 42(4), 28-.
Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., LaMar, T., Leshin, M., Selbach-Allen, M., & Pérez-Núñez, G. (2021). The Transformative Impact of a Mathematical Mindset Experience Taught at Scale. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.784393
Boaler, J., & Dweck, C. (2015). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential Through Creative Math, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching (First edition.). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Boaler J, Chen L, Williams C, & Cordero M. (2016). Seeing as Understanding: The Importance of Visual Mathematics for our Brain and Learning. Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics, 5(5), DOI: 10.4172/2168-9679.1000325
Boshuizen, H. P. A., Gruber, H., & Strasser, J. (2020). Knowledge restructuring through case processing: The key to generalise expertise development theory across domains? Educational Research Review, 29, 100310-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100310
Boshuizen, H. P. A., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). What and how advanced medical students learn from reasoning through multiple cases. Instructional Science, 40(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9211-z
Bainbridge, W. A., Hall, E. H. & Baker, C. I. (2019). Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory. Nat Commun 10, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07830-6
Brezovszky, B., McMullen, J., Veermans, K., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Pongsakdi, N., & Lehtinen, E. (2019). Effects of a mathematics game-based learning environment on primary school students’ adaptive number knowledge. Computer & Education, 128, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.011
Brunner, E., & Star, J. R. (2024). The quality of mathematics teaching from a mathematics educational perspective: what do we actually know and which questions are still open? ZDM, 56(5), 775–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01600-z
Bui, P., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Brezovszky, B., Lehtinen, E., & McMullen, J. (2023). Promoting Adaptive Number Knowledge Through Deliberate Practice in the Number Navigation Game. In Kiili, K., Antti, K., de Rosa, F., Dindar, M., Kickmeier-Rust, M., & Bellotti, F., Games and Learning Alliance: 11th International Conference, GALA 2022, Tampere, Finland, November 30 - December 2, 2022, Proceedings (1st ed., Vol. 13647), Springer International Publishing, pp. 127–136.
Bui, P., Pongsakdi, N., McMullen, J., Lehtinen, E., & Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. (2023). A systematic review of mindset interventions in mathematics classrooms: What works and what does not? Educational Research Review, 40, 100554-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100554
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2021). Sustainable, scalable professional development in early mathematics: Strategies, evaluation, and tools. In Li, Y., Howe, R. E., Lewis, W. J., Madden, J. J. (eds), Developing Mathematical Proficiency for Elementary Instruction (pp. 221–238), Springer International Publishing
Charlin, B., Tardif, J., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2000). Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Academic Medicine, 75(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200002000-00020
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (Eighth edition., Vol. 1). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Recommendation on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. General Secretariat of the Council.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311.
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Star, J. (2020). Expertise in developing students’ expertise in mathematics: Bridging teachers’ professional knowledge and instructional quality. ZDM, 52(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01148-8
Diamond, N. B., Armson, M. J., & Levine, B. (2020). The Truth Is Out There: Accuracy in Recall of Verifiable Real-World Events. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1544-1556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620954812
van Dijk, E. E., Geertsema, J., van der Schaaf, M. F., van Tartwijk, J., & Kluijtmans, M. (2023). Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge. Higher Education, 86(4), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00953-2
Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM, 44(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0432-z
English, L. D., Humble, S., & Barnes, V. E. (2010). Trailblazers. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(7), 402–409. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41199504
Ericsson, K. A. (2018). The differential influence of experience, practice and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., Hoffman, R. R., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 745-769
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What Mathematics Education May Prepare Students for the Society of the Future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Hickendorff, M., McMullen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). Mathematical flexibility: Theoretical, methodological, and educational considerations. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.10085
Hong, W., Star, J. R., Liu, R.-D., Jiang, R., & Fu, X. (2023). A Systematic Review of Mathematical Flexibility: Concepts, Measurements, and Related Research. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 104-. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2
Jarodzka, H., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Lanzer, P. (2013). Cognitive Skills in Medicine. In Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions (pp. 69–86). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_7
Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2013). Learning from the Eastern and the Western debate: the case of mathematics teacher education. ZDM, 45(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0490-x
Lehtinen, E., Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Aflecht, G., Lehtinen, H., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., McMullen, J., Pongsakdi, N., Veermans, K., & Jaakkola, T. (n.d.). Number Navigation Game (NNG): Design Principles and Game Description. In Describing and Studying Domain-Specific Serious Games (pp. 45–61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20276-1_4
Lehtinen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M., McMullen, J., & Gruber, H. (2017). Cultivating mathematical skills: From drill-and-practice to deliberate practice. ZDM, 49(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858- 017-0856-6
Loftus E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
Newton, K. J., Star, J. R., & Lynch, K. (2010). Understanding the Development of Flexibility in Struggling Algebra Students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.482150
Meyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023). What makes online professional development effective? The effect of quality characteristics on teachers’ satisfaction and changes in their professional practices. Computers and Education, 200, 104805-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104805
McMullen, J., Brezovszky, B., Rodríguez-Afecht, G., Pongsakdi, N., Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2016). Adaptive number knowledge: Exploring the foundations of adaptivity with whole-number arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 172–181. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.lindif.2016.02.007
McMullen, J., Chan, J. Y.-C., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. (2019). Spontaneous mathematical focusing tendencies in mathematical development and education. In Norton, A., & Alibali, M. W. (Eds.), Constructing Number (pp. 69–86). Springer International Publishing.
McMullen, J., Verschaffel, L., & Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. (2020). Spontaneous mathematical focusing tendencies in mathematical development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1818466
Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland. (2023). Finnish National STEM Strategy and Action Plan: Experts in natural sciences, technology and mathematics in support of society's welfare and growth. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-263-733-8
Mulcahy, C., Day Hess, C. A., Clements, D. H., Ernst, J. R., Pan, S. E., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Sarama, J. (2021). Supporting young children’s development of executive function through early mathematics. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211033005
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ohtonen Piuva, A., Mårtensson, E., Röj-Lindberg, A.-S., & Braskén, M. (2023). Finnish Pre-Service Teachers’ Basic Mathematical Skills: A Comparison Between 2008 and 2020. FMSERA Journal. https://journal.fi/fmsera/article/view/127787
Parker, R., & Humphreys, C. (2018). Digging Deeper: Making Number Talks Matter Even More, Grades 3-10 (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681016
Pinker, S. (2021). Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters. Viking.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2020). How Can Cognitive-Science Research Help Improve Education? The Case of Comparing Multiple Strategies to Improve Mathematics Learning and Teaching. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 29(6), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420969365
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2012). Developing procedural flexibility: Are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02037.x
Si, J. (2022). Strategies for developing pre-clinical medical students’ clinical reasoning based on illness script formation: a systematic review. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 34(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.219
Star, J. R. (2023). Revisiting the origin of, and reflections on the future of, pedagogical content knowledge. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231175885
Star, J. R., Newton, K., Pollack, C., Kokka, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., & Durkin, K. (2015). Student, teacher, and instructional characteristics related to students’ gains in flexibility. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.001
Stigler, J. W, & Miller, K. F. (2018). Expertise and Expert Performance in Teaching. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., Hoffman, R. R., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 431-452
Shulman L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Tossavainen, T., & Leppäaho, H. (2018). Matematiikan opettajien ja opettajaksi opiskelevien matemaattisesta osaamisesta [About the mathematical competence of mathematics teachers and student teachers]. In Joutsenlahti, J., Räsänen, P., & Silfverberg, H. (Eds.), Matematiikan opetus ja oppiminen, Niilo Mäki Instituutti, pp. 294-.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4
Verschaffel, L. (2024). Strategy flexibility in mathematics. ZDM, 56(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01491-6
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: a survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., Sánchez, R., & Múñez, D. (2022). Arithmetic word problem solving. Analysis of Singaporean and Spanish textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10169-x
Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2015). Keeping an Eye on Learning: Differences Between Expert and Novice Teachers’ Representation of Classroom Management Events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549810
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., van den Bogert, N., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0