Perspectives on Momentary Engagement and Learning Situated in Classroom Contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a strong call for more fine-grained analyses of student engagement to better capture its nature as a situated, momentary phenomenon. This special issue aims to promote cross-disciplinary discussions about the complex processes involved in students’ momentary engagement and learning situated in classroom contexts. Momentary engagement is conceptualized as students’ involvement with learning activities over short time intervals. We begin by presenting definitional, conceptual, and methodological reflections on the construct of momentary engagement, highlighting how moment-to-moment analyses can deepen our understanding of how engagement unfolds in complex, dynamic learning environments. Next, we discuss the need for a holistic and multidisciplinary perspective to foster an integrative understanding of contexts and conditions under which students engage in academic tasks. Finally, we provide a brief overview of the papers in this special issue, emphasising their diverse methodological approaches to capturing students’ momentary engagement and summarizing their main results that offer practical insights on supporting engagement. Each contribution reflects the efforts of a multidisciplinary team who have studied students’ momentary engagement and learning across various contexts, combining insights and identifying cross-disciplinary synergies in theory and method. The authors integrate perspectives from various fields of research, including motivation, emotion, self-regulation, engagement, social interaction and conceptual change. Their research draws on student samples from the United States, Finland, Ireland, and the United Kingdom.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
Böheim, R., Daumiller, M., & Seidel, T. (2024). A longitudinal study of student hand raising: Stability and reciprocal dynamics with cognitive elaboration and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000838
Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Fredricks, J. A. (2022). The measurement of student engagement: Methodological advances and comparison of new self-report instruments. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (2nd ed. 2022, pp. 597–616). Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., & Wang, M.‑T. (2019). Addressing the challenge of measuring student engagement. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), Cambridge handbook on motivation and learning (pp. 689–712). Cambridge University Press.
Garner, J. K., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A complex dynamic systems perspective on teacher learning and identity formation: an instrumental case. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811
Kaplan, A. (2016). Research on motivation and achievement: Infatuation with constructs and losing sight of the phenomenon. International Conference on Motivation, Thessalonki, Greece.
Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., Malmberg, L.‑E., Collie, R. J., & Calvo, R. A. (2015). Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.014
Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.002
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2022). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (2nd ed. 2022). Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8
Salmela-Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upadyaya, K. (2021). Student Engagement in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Longitudinal Studies 2010-2020. Journal of Research on Adolescence : The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 31(2), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12619
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.
Skinner, E. A., & Raine, K. E. (2022). Unlocking the positive synergy between engagement and motivation. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (2nd ed. 2022, pp. 25–56). Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer.
Symonds, Schreiber, J. B., & Symonds, J. (2021). Silver linings and storm clouds: Divergent profiles of student momentary engagement emerge in response to the same task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000605
Symonds, J. E., Kaplan, A., Upadyaya, K., Aro, K. S., Torsney, B. M., Skinner, E., & Eccles, J. S. (2024). Momentary student engagement as a dynamic developmental system. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000288
Torsney, B. M., & Symonds, J. E. (2019). The professional student program for educational resilience: Enhancing momentary engagement in classwork. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 676–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1687414
Wang, M.‑T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019). An integrative development-in-sociocultural-context model for children's engagement in learning. The American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000522
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3