With sensitive eyes: ECEC teachers’ visual gaze and related reflections on pedagogical actions in toddler groups using eye-tracking glasses
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explored early childhood education and care (ECEC) teachers’ visual gaze and related reflections on pedagogical actions during pedagogical activities in groups of children under three years of age in Finland. The data were collected from play and teacher-guided activities using mobile eye-tracking glasses, the retrospective thinking aloud (RTA) method, and semi-structured interviews. The results showed that even though the teachers were surprised about some aspects of the visual gaze metrics, they reflected on and gave reasons for their visual gazes on children. When observing gaze data from play, teachers explained the high amount of gaze by citing children’s particular needs. When observing gaze data from guided activities, teachers reflected on children’s unpredictable behavior and noted that the children’s need for support in concentration was linked to more gazes by the teacher. The findings showed that both during play and guided activities, children seeking a gaze and the position of children in the classroom influenced the number of teachers’ gazes. In the teachers’ explanations of their visual gaze and related pedagogical actions, five categories were identified: protection; physical and emotional availability, teaching and learning; facilitation; and initiatives. This explorative study showed that teachers utilize their knowledge concerning children’s individuality, development, and learning when they explain their decisions concerning their visual gaze and pedagogical activities with toddlers. The use of mobile eye-tracking technology is relatively new; therefore, its applications to ECEC are pioneering for the development of the field in relation to the practices and research of toddlers’ groups and groups with older children in ECEC
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Atkins, L., & Wallace, S. (2012). Qualitative research in education. SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957602
Bae, B. (2009). Children’s right to participate – Challenges in everyday interaction. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930903101594
Booren, L. M., Downer, D., & Vitiello, V. E. (2012). Observations of children’s interactions with teachers, peers, and tasks across preschool classroom activity settings. Early Education and Development, 23(4), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101100
Chaudhuri, S., Pakarinen, E., Muhonen, H., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2024). Association between the teacher–student relationship and teacher visual focus of attention in Grade 1: student task avoidance and gender as moderators. Educational Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2024.2346104
Chaudhuri, S., Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2022a). Teachers’ Focus of Attention in First-grade Classrooms: Exploring Teachers Experiencing Less and More Stress Using Mobile Eye-tracking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1076–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958374
Chaudhuri, S., Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2022b). Teachers' visual focus of attention in relation to students' basic academic skills and teachers' individual support for students: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, Article 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102179
Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430500131288
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
Colson, E. R., & Dworkin, P. H. (1997). Toddler development. Pediatrics in review, 18(8), 255–259. https://depts.washington.edu/dbpeds/ToddlerDvt.pdf
Dessus, P., Cosnefroy, O., & Luengo, V. (2016). “Keep your eyes on ‘em all!”: A mobile eye-tracking analysis of teachers’ sensitivity to students. Adaptive and Adaptable Learning, 9891, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_6
Doyle, W. (1980). Classroom management. Kappa Delta Pi (Indiana, United States), 1–35. doi:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED206567.pdf
Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity (2012). http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2022). National core curriculum for early childhood education and care (Regulation OPH-700-2022). Finnish National Agency for Education.
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), Companion to qualitative research (pp. 178–183). SAGE Publishing.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 316–344. https://doi.org/10/c7kr67
Guedes, C., Cadima, J., Aguiar, T. Aguiar, C., & Barata, C. (2020). Activity settings in toddler classrooms and quality of group and individual interactions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 67, Article 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101100
Goldberg, P., Schwerter, J., Seidel, T., Muller, K., & Sturmer, K. (2021). How does learners’ behavior attract preservice teachers’ attention during teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, Article 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103213
Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2002). Infant/toddler caregiving: A guide to routines. CDE Press.
Haataja, E., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2020). The relation between teacher-student eye contact and teachers’ interpersonal behavior during group work: A multiple-person gaze-tracking case study in secondary mathematics education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09538-w
Hakkarainen, P., Brėdikytė, M., Jakkula, K., & Munter, H. (2013). Adult play guidance and children’s play development in a narrative play-world. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.789189
Harkoma, S. M., Sajaniemi, N. K., Suhonen, E., & Saha, M. (2021). Impact of pedagogical intervention on early childhood professionals’ emotional availability to children with different temperament characteristics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1895264
Helavaara Robertson, L., Kinos, J., Barbour, N., Pukk, M., & Rosqvist, L. (2015). Child-initiated pedagogies in Finland, Estonia and England: exploring young children’s views on decisions. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11-12), 1815–1827. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028392
Hietanen, J., Leppänen, J., Peltola, M., Linna-Aho, K., & Ruuhiala, H. (2008). Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach–avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2423–2430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.029
Holloway, I. (2011). Being a qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 21(7), 968–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310395607
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & DeWeijer, J. (2015). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
Huang, Y., Miller, K. F., Cortina, K. S., & Richter, D. (2021). Teachers’ professional vision in action: Comparing expert and novice teacher’s real-life eye movements in the classroom. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 37(1-2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000313
Häggström, C., Englund, M., & Lindroos, O. (2015). Examining the gaze behaviors of
harvester operators: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 26(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10/f3ptw6
Hännikäinen, M. (2013). Varhaiskasvatus pienten lasten päiväkotiryhmissä: Hoitoa, kasvatusta vai opetusta? [Early childhood education in the young children’s day care groups: Care, education or teaching?]. In K. Karila & L. Lipponen (Eds.), Varhaiskasvatuksen pedagogiikka [The pedagogy of early childhood education] (pp. 28–56). Vastapaino.
Hännikäinen, M. (2015). The teacher’s lap – A site of emotional well-being for the younger children in day-care groups. Early Child Development and Care, 185(5), 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.957690
Ishibashi, M., Takahashi, M., & Nozawa, S. (2020). Relationship between ECEC (early childhood education and care) staff’s years of professional experience and gaze patterns: A study using wearable eye trackers. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 27(4), 540–53. https://10.11225/cs.2020.019.
Isotalo, S., Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., Lämsä, J. & Rutanen, N. (2024). Early Childhood Education and Care Teachers’ Gaze Behavior Across Pedagogical Episodes in Toddler Groups in Finland. International Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-023-00387-6
Jamison, K., Cabell, S., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2014). CLASS–infant: An observational measure for assessing teacher–infant interactions in center-based childcare. Early Education and Development, 25(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2013.822239
Johansson, C., Åberg, M., & Hedlin, M. (2021) Touch the children, or please don’t – Preschool teachers’ approach to touch. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1705893
Kangas, J., Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Ranta, S., Chydenius, H., Lahdenperä, J., Neitola, M., Kinos, J., Sajaniemi, N., & Ruokonen, I. (2021). Understanding Different Approaches to ECE Pedagogy through Tensions. Education Sciences, 11(12), Article 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120790
Kettukangas, T. (2017). Perustoiminnot-käsite varhaiskasvatuksessa [The concept of basic-activities in ECEC]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Eastern Finland Savonlinna]. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Education, Humanities, and Theology.
La Paro, K. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. (2012). Classroom assessment scoring system - toddler. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Ledbury, R., White, I., & Darn, S. (2004). The importance of eye contact in the classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(8), 11–21. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Darn-EyeContact.html
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). The only generalization: There is no generalization. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method key issues, key texts (pp. 27–44). SAGE Publishing.
Lucas Revilla, Y., Rutanen, N., Harju, K., Sevon, E., & Raittila, R. (2022). Relational approach to infant-teacher lap interactions during the transition from home to early childhood education and care. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 11(1), 253-271. https://journal.fi/jecer/article/view/114018
Lunn Browlee, J., Schraw, G., Walker, S., & Ryan, M. (2016). Changes in preservice teachers’ personal epistemologies. In J. Greene, B. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 300–325). Routledge.
Lämsä, T. (2021). Kokopäiväpedagogiikka ja sen kehittäminen varhaiskasvatuksessa [The whole day pedagogy and its development in ECEC]. Kasvatus ja aika, 15(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.33350/ka.102527
McIntyre, N. A., Draycott, B., & Wolff, C. E. (2021). Keeping track of expert teachers: Comparing the affordances of think-aloud elicited by two different video perspectives. Learning and Instruction, 80, Article 101563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101563
McIntyre, N. A., & Foulsham, T. (2018). Scanpath analysis of expertise and culture in teacher gaze in real-world classrooms. Instructional Science, 46(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9445-x
McIntyre, N. A., Jarodzka, H., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). Capturing teacher priorities: Using real-world eye-tracking to investigate expert teacher priorities across two cultures. Learning and Instruction, 60, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.003
McIntyre, N. A., & Mainhard, T. M. (2020). Looking to relate: Teacher gaze and culture in student-rated teacher interpersonal behaviour. Social Psychology of Education, 23(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09541-2
Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., & Lerkkanen, M-K. (2022). Professional vision of Grade 1 teachers experiencing different levels of work-related stress. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, Article 103585. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tate.2021.103585
Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2020). Dialogue through eyes: Exploring teachers’ focus of attention during educational dialogue. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101607
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Engaging young children: Lessons from research about quality in early childhood education and care. Starting strong. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085145-en
Pihlaja, P., & Holst, T. (2013). How reflective are teachers? A study of kindergarten teachers´ and special teachers´ levels in reflection in day care. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628691
Pramling Samuelsson, I. & Asplund Carlsson, M. (2008). The Playing Learning Child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 623–641, https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497265
Pursi, A. (2019). Play in adult-child interaction: Institutional multi-party interaction and pedagogical practice in a toddler classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 36–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.014.
Ranta, S., Kangas, J., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., Neitola, M., Kinos, J., Sajaniemi, N., & Kuusisto, A. (2023). Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence in Finnish Early Childhood Education. A Narrative Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(8), Article 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080791
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
Rutanen, N., Raittila, R., Harju, K., Lucas Revilla, Y., & Hännikäinen, M. (2023). Negotiating Ethics-in-Action in a Long-term Research Relationship with a Young Child. Human Arenas, 6(2), 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00216-z
Sadamatsu, J. (2022). Experienced nursery teachers gaze longer at children during play than do novice teachers: An eye-tracking study. Asia Pacific Education Review 24, 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09818-w
Salminen, J., Guedes, C., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Pakarinen, E., & Cadima, J. (2021a). Teacher–Child Interaction Quality and Children’s Self-Regulation in Toddler Classrooms in Portugal and Finland. Infant and Child Development, 30(3). Article e2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2222
Salminen, J., Muhonen, H. & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2021b). Scaffolding patterns of dialogic exchange in toddler classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, Article 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100489
Salomon, A., Sumsion, J., & Harrison, J. (2017). Infants draw on ‘emotional capital’ in early childhood education contexts: A new paradigm. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(4), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117742771
Seidel, T., Schnitzler, K., Kosel, C., Stürmer, K., & Holzberger, D. (2021). Student characteristics in the eyes of teachers: Differences between novice and expert teachers in judgment accuracy, observed behavioral cues, and gaze. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09532-2
Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739–771. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321
Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M. & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009.
Sherin M. G. & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers' Professional Vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(20), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
Shinoda, H., Yamamoto, T., & Imai-Matsumura, K. (2021). Teachers’ visual processing of children’s off-task behaviors in class: A comparison between teachers and student teachers. PLoS ONE, 16(11). Article e0259410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259410
Slot, P. L., Bleses, D., Justice, L. M., Markussen-Brown, J., & Højen, A. (2018). Structural and process quality of Danish preschools: Direct and indirect associations with children’s growth in language and preliteracy skills. Early Education and Development, 29(4), 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1452494
Smidekova, Z., Janik, M., Minarikova, E., & Holmqvist, K. (2020). Teachers’ gaze over space and time in a real-world classroom. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.4.1
Thomason, A. C., & La Paro, K. M. (2009). Measuring the quality of teacher–child interactions in toddler child care. Early Education and Development, 20, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280902773351
Tight, M. (2010). The curious case of case study: a viewpoint. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570903187181
Tobii AB. (2018). Tobii pro glasses 2 product description manual (v 1.95). https://www.tobiipro.com/siteassets/tobii-pro/product-descriptions/tobii-pro-glasses-2-product-
van den Bogert, N., van Bruggen, J., Kostons, D., & Jochems, W. (2014). First steps into understanding teachers’ visual perception of classroom events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.09.001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040505036
Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., & Fonsén, E. (2018). Researching Finnish early childhood teachers’ pedagogical work using Layder’s research map. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(4), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.43.4.06
Whittaker, J. E. V., Williford, A. P., Carter, L. M., Vitiello, V. E., & Hatfield, B. E. (2018). Using a standardized task to assess the quality of teacher–child dyadic interactions in preschool. Early Education and Development, 29(2), 266–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1387960
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2020). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0