Language-dependent knowledge acquisition Mechanisms underlying language-switching costs in arithmetic fact learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Within the research on bilingual learning, first studies have revealed that content learned in one language is retrieved more slowly when participants have to switch language from instruction to testing (i.e., language-switching costs, LSC). These costs are attributed to language-dependent knowledge representations. However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying LSC are still largely unknown. We investigated these mechanisms by using strategy as well as translation self-reports and by analysing oscillatory parameters in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Thirty-six university students learned arithmetic facts of three different operations over four days either in English or in German. Afterwards, they were tested in both languages with concurrent assessments of self-reports and electrophysiological activity. As expected, LSC in response latencies were observed in all arithmetic tasks. More importantly, analyses of self-reports and EEG revealed that both translation processes and calculation procedures contribute to LSC, with translation processes being the main cognitive mechanism underlying LSC. These results corroborate previous findings of language-dependent knowledge representations in arithmetic fact learning and shed new light on the cognitive mechanisms underlying LSC and possible educational consequences.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual matters.
BioSemi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://www.biosemi.com/
Campbell, J. I., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.299
Dallinger, S., Jonkmann, K., Hollm, J., & Fiege, C. (2016). The effect of content and language integrated learning on students' English and history competences–Killing two birds with one stone?. Learning and instruction, 41, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) class-rooms (Vol. 20). John Benjamins Publishing.
Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., & Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008
De Smedt, B., Grabner, R. H., & Studer, B. (2009). Oscillatory EEG correlates of arithmetic strat-egy use in addition and subtraction. Experimental Brain Research, 195(4), 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1839-9
EACEA, Eurydice, & Eurostat (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Brus-sels: Eurydice.
Fleckenstein, J., Gebauer, S. K., & Möller, J. (2019). Promoting mathematics achievement in one-way immersion: Performance development over four years of elementary school. Contempo-rary Educational Psychology, 56, 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.010
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. (1963). Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors (revised 1963). Educational Testing Service Princeton NJ.
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4117.001.0001
Grabner, R. H., & De Smedt, B. (2011). Neurophysiological evidence for the validity of verbal strategy reports in mental arithmetic. Biological psychology, 87(1), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.019
Grabner, R. H., & De Smedt, B. (2012). Oscillatory EEG correlates of arithmetic strategies: a training study. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00428
Grabner, R. H., Saalbach, H., & Eckstein, D. (2012). Language‐switching costs in bilingual math-ematics learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 147-155. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01150.x
Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D. A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., Goj, R., Jas, M., Brooks, T., Parkkonen, L., & Hämäläinen, M. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
Hahn, C. G., Saalbach, H., & Grabner, R. H. (2017). Language-dependent knowledge acquisition: investigating bilingual arithmetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000530
Huhta, A., Luoma, S., Oscarson, M., Sajavaara, K., Takala, S., & Teasdale, A. (2002). DIALANG: A diagnostic language assessment system for learners. Common European framework of ref-erence for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Case studies, 130-145.
Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2007). The development of strategy use in elementary school children: Working memory and individual differences. Journal of experimental child psy-chology, 96(4), 284-309. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.001
Ischebeck, A., Zamarian, L., Siedentopf, C., Koppelstätter, F., Benke, T., Felber, S., & Delazer, M. (2006). How specifically do we learn? Imaging the learning of multiplication and subtrac-tion. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1365-1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.016
Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test: BIS-Test Form 4. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Kirk, E.P., and M.H. Ashcraft. 2001. Telling stories: the perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cogni-tion 27(1): 157–175. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.157
LeFevre, J. A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.216
Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27(2), 364-382. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211420
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325-343. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
Linguatec (2015). Retrieved from http://www.linguatec.de/en/text-to-speech/voice-reader-studio-15/.
Lo, Y.Y., & Lo, E. S. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499615
Malt, B., & Wolff, P. (Eds.). (2010). Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marian, V., & Fausey, C. M. (2006). Language‐dependent memory in bilingual learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1025-1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1242
Marian, V., & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.361
Mochida, K., & Harrington, M. (2006). The yes/no test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 2, 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt321oa
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11), 1842–1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J. U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised con-trolled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language in-tegrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001
Saalbach, H., Eckstein, D., Andri, N., Hobi, R., & Grabner, R. H. (2013). When language of in-struction and language of application differ: Cognitive costs of bilingual mathematics learn-ing. Learning and Instruction, 26, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.01.002
Smith-Chant, B. L., & LeFevre, J. A. (2003). Doing as they are told and telling it like it is: Self-reports in mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196094
Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, S. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition, 78(1), 45-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00108-6
Schmitt, D. (2005). Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC). ESOL Tests and Testing, 100-102.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 71-85). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_6
Syndicate, U.C.L.E. (2001). Oxford Quick Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tschentscher, N., & Hauk, O. (2016). Frontal and parietal cortices show different spatiotemporal dynamics across problem-solving stages. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(8), 1098-1110. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00958
Vanbinst, K., Ghesquiere, P., & De Smedt, B. (2012). Numerical magnitude representations and individual differences in children's arithmetic strategy use. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01148.x
Venkatraman, V., Siong, S. C., Chee, M. W., & Ansari, D. (2006). Effect of language switching on arithmetic: A bilingual fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775250067
Volmer, E., Grabner, R. H., & Saalbach, H. (2018). Language switching costs in bilingual mathe-matics learning: Transfer effects and individual differences. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissen-schaft, 21(1), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0761-0
Wolff, D. (2011). Der bilinguale Sachfachunterricht (CLIL): Was dafür spricht, ihn als innovatives didaktisches Konzept zu bezeichnen. In Forum Sprache, 6, 74-83.