Supporting Integration of Multiple Source Perspectives Through Dialogic Argumentation
Main Article Content
Abstract
We report a study examining, for the first time, the effectiveness of engagement in dialogic argumentation in relation to its ability to promote integration of multiple source perspectives in an argumentive writing task after reading controversial multiple texts. Sixty-four primary school students engaged in a dialog-based intervention aiming to support them to learn to argue. Participants’ argument skills have been improved and transferred to a writing task completed after reading novel multiple texts on new, non-intervention, topics. In particular, the experimental group participants showed gains in their ability to integrate multiple source perspectives in an argumentive writing task after reading controversial multiple texts, compared with a control group which engaged in business-as-usual school curriculum. Microgenetic data revealed a progressive development of experimental participants’ integration skill throughout their engagement in the argumentive discourse activity. The findings have important educational implications. They show that learning to argue by engaging in dialogic argumentation is a promising pathway for supporting the ability to integrate multiple source perspectives after reading controversial multiple texts.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Barzilai, S., & Weinstock, M. (2020). Beyond trustworthiness: Comprehending multiple source perspectives. In P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives (pp. 123–140). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443961-11
Barzilai, S., & Ka’adan, I. (2017). Learning to integrate divergent information sources: The interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 193-232. 10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7.
Barzilai, S., Tzadok, E., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation. Instructional Science, 43(6), 737-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9359-4
Bialystok, E. (2017, April). Bilingual Children Can Focus Better. Child and Family Blog.
https://www.childandfamilyblog.com/early-childhood-development/bilingual-children-focus/
Bigot, L. L., & Rouet, J. F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students' comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960701675317
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: The roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 26(3), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9371-x
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø. 2014. Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. In British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12005
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes, 276-314.
Chatham, C. (2007). Doubting the "Bilingual cognitive advantage": Just an effect of socio-economic status? Science Blogs: developing intelligence. https://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/10/31/the-bilingual-advantage-may-ac
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2021). Education for a “post-truth” world: New directions for research and practice. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940
Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.448
De La Paz, S., Monte‐Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., & Piantedosi, K. W. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.147
Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018). Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 907-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21468
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146
Ferguson, L. E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003
Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.001
Fisher, M., Knobe, J., Strickland, B., & Keil, F. C. (2017). The influence of social interaction on intuitions of objectivity and subjectivity. Cognitive Science, 41(4), 1119-1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12380
Felton, M., Crowell, A., & Liu, T. (2015). Arguing to agree: Mitigating my-side bias through
consensus-seeking dialogue. Written Communication, 32(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
Felton, M. K., & Herko, S. (2004). From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding
adolescents' persuasive writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(8), 672-
Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New
Haven: Yale University Press.
Hobbs, R., & Frost, R. (2003). Measuring the acquisition of media‐literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330-355. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.3.2
Iordanou, K. (2010). Developing argument skills across scientific and social domains. Journal of Cognition and Development. 11(3), 293-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.485335
Iordanou, K. (2016a). From theory of mind to epistemic cognition. A Lifespan perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 106 – 119. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i5.252
Iordanou, K. (2016b). Developing epistemological understanding through argumentation in scientific and social domains. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. 30(2-3), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000172
Iordanou, K. (2022). Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: The role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09289-1
Iordanou, K. & Constantinou. C. P. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99, 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21152
Iordanou, K., Kendeou., P., & Beker, K. (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In W. Sandoval, J. Greene, & I., Bråten. (Eds). Handbook of Epistemic Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795225
Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Zembylas, M. (2020). Examining my-side bias during and after reading controversial historical accounts. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09240-w
Iordanou, K. & Kuhn, D. (2020). Contemplating the Opposition: Does a personal touch matter? Discourse Processes. 57(4), 343-359. DOI:10.1080/0163853X.2019.1701918
Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Flora Matos, Yuchen Shi, & Laura Hemberger. (2019). Learning by arguing. Learning and Instruction. 63, 101-207. 101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.004
Iordanou, K., & Rapanta, C. (2021). “Argue with me”: A method for developing argument skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631203
Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2011). Perspective taking in computer-mediated instructional communication. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(4), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000056
Kienhues, D., Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2020). Sealing the gateways for post-truthism: Reestablishing the epistemic authority of science. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1784012
Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the web: When expert information breeds laypersons' doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004
Kim, H. Y., LaRusso, M. D., Hsin, L. B., Harbaugh, A. G., Selman, R. L., & Snow, C. E. (2018). Social perspective-taking performance: Construct, measurement, and relations with academic performance and engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.05.005
Kohn, A. (2010, January). Getting Rid of Grades: Case Studies. Alfie Kohn. https://www.alfiekohn.org/blogs/getting-rid-grades-case-studies/
Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79(1), 233-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01190.x
Kuhn, D. (2017). Building Our Best Future Thinking Critically About Ourselves and Our World Teachers Edition. New York, NY, USA: Wessex Press, Inc.
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Tracing the development of argumentive writing in a discourse-rich context. Written Communication, 33(1), 92–121. doi:10.1177/0741088315617157
Kuhn, D., & Iordanou, K. (2022). Why do people argue past one another rather than with one another?. In N. Ballantyne, & D. Dunning (Eds.), Reason, Bias, and Inquiry: The Crossroads of Epistemology and Psychology (pp. 324-338). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197636916.003.0015
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child development, 74(5), 1245-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605
Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition & Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
Lalonde, C. E., & Chandler, M. J. (2002). Children's understanding of interpretation. New Ideas in
Psychology, 20(2-3), 163-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-118x(02)00007-7
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019). Toward an integrated framework of multiple text use. Educational Psychologist, 54(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514
List, A., Du, H., Wang, Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2019). Toward a typology of integration: Examining the documents model framework. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.00
Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2016). Effects of text-belief consistency and reading task on the strategic validation of multiple texts. European Journal of Psychology f Education, 31(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0270-9
Mateos, M., & Solé, I. (2009). Synthesising information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at different educational levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03178760
Mayweg-Paus, E., Macagno, F., & Kuhn, D. (2016). Developing argumentation strategies in
electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective?. Discourse Processes, 53(4), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2015.1040323
Mill, J. S. (1859/1996). On liberty. In D. Wootton (Ed.), Modern political thought: Readings from Machiavelli to Nietzsche (pp. 605–672). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Monte-Sano, C. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension and summary: Learning to read and write in history by focusing on evidence, perspective, and interpretation. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 212-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873x.2011.00547.x
Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x12450445
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Paul, J., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2019). Effects of a sourcing prompt and conflicts in reading materials on elementary students’ use of source information. Discourse Processes, 56(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2017.1402165
Piaget, J. (1928). The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2019). Individual representation in a community of knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.011
Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2019). Individual representation in a community of knowledge. Trends in cognitive sciences, 23(10), 891-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.011
Rapanta, C., Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: A Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review 34, 477–509 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: a two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968.
Rukavina, I., & Daneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 272–287. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.88.2.272.
Shi, Y. (2019). Enhancing evidence-based argumentation in a Mainland China middle school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, Article 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101809
Shi, Y. (2020). Talk about evidence during argumentation. Discourse Processes, 57(9), 770–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1777498
Shi, Y., Matos, F., & Kuhn, D. (2019). Dialog as a bridge to argumentative writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.04
Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Skodzik, T., & Bromme, R. (2014). Comprehending multiple documents on scientific controversies: Effects of reading goals and signaling rhetorical relationships. Discourse Processes, 51(1-2), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855535
Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
Tarchi, C., & Mason, L. (2020). Effects of critical thinking on multiple-document comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00426-8
Travis, T.A. (2017). Grading for Communication NOT Compensation. TrustED. https://trustedschool.org/2017/11/12/grading-for-communication-not-compensation/
Van Meteris, P., List, A., Lombardi, D., & Kendeou, P. (2020). Handbook of Learning from Multiple Representations and Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443961
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walton, D. (1999). One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias. SUNY Press.
Wiley, J., Jaeger, A. J., & Griffin, T. D. (2018). Effects of instructional conditions on comprehension from multiple sources in history and science. In Handbook of Multiple Source Use (pp. 341-361). Routledge.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
Zavala, J., & Kuhn, D. (2017). Solitary Discourse Is a Productive Activity. Psychological Science, 28(5), 578-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689248