The impact of academically and socially focused peer relations on children’s engagement and academic progress in primary school
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previous research suggests connections between peer relationships and children’s engagement and learning within the classroom. However few studies have explored these connections in detail or considered the possible processes that may begin to explain the linkages. This study collected systematic data from different respondents within primary school settings to help clarify the role of peers in classroom engagement and learning.
Over 800 pupils based in English primary schools were involved in a multi-method study. Peer-sociometric questionnaires provided measures of academic peer relations, informal-social peer relations, such as being accepted as a work partner and liked as a person to play with, playground group centrality and leadership. Self-report questionnaires provided data on school engagement, disengagement, and disaffection. Science attainment data were collected at the start and end of the year. Momentary behavioural engagement was observed in classrooms for a subsample of pupils who were also rated by their teachers in terms of their attention and behaviour in class.
Findings revealed small to moderate associations between peer relations measures, multiple measures of school and classroom engagement, attainment, and progress. Multiple regressions examined peer relations measures relative to momentary, classroom and school engagement and learning outcomes. Findings highlight important overlaps and differences in the predictors of different types of engagement. They also highlight the variety of ways in which peer relationships, whether academically or socially focused, may have different implications for engagement at momentary, classroom, and school levels. Findings indicate that academic peer acceptance is predictive of engagement at the different levels and science attainment. However, informal-social peer relations were more highly connected with class disruption, school disengagement and disaffection and were negative predictors of attainment and progress over the year. This suggests different pathways for children with different types of relationships with peers relative to engagement and adjustment highlighting complex connections between social and academic life in school.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Altermatt, E. R. (2012). Children’s achievement-related discourse with peers: Uncovering the processes of peer influence. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 109–132). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Anderson, L. W., & Scott, C. C. (1978). The relationship among teaching methods, student characteristics, and student involvement in learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717802900323
Baines, E., & Blatchford, P. (2009). Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X371114
Baines, E. & Blatchford, P. (2011). Children's games and playground activities in school and their role in development. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play (pp. 260-283). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195393002.013.0020
Baines, E., & Blatchford, P. (2023). The decline in breaktimes and lunchtimes in primary and secondary schools in England: Results from three national surveys spanning 25 years. British Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 925–946 . https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3874
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582231
Baines, E., & MacIntyre, H. (2022). Children’s social experiences with peers and friends during primary school mealtimes. Educational Review, 74(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1680534
Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior.
Barton, K. (2017). MuMIn: Multi-model Inference. R package Version 1.40. 0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H., Singmann, H., & Dai, B. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7. 2014. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Blatchford, P. (2003). The class size debate: Is small better? McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2010). Peer relations in school. In K. Littleton, C. Wood & J. Kleine-Staarman (Eds) International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp227-276). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Blatchford, P., Baines, E., & Pellegrini, A. (2003). The social context of school playground games: Sex and ethnic differences, and changes over time after entry to junior school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322535183
Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 750. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.750
Blatchford, P., Pellegrini, A. D., & Baines, E. (2015). The child at school: Interactions with peers and teachers. Routledge.
Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109360993
Buhs, E. S., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: An examination of mediating processes. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.550
Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge University.
Cairns, R., Xie, H., & Leung, M. (1998). The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: Toward a new balance. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1998(81), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219988104
Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement (Vol. 840). Springer.
Cillessen, A. H., & van den Berg, Y. H. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In G. W. Ladd & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Information Age Publishing.
De Laet, S., Colpin, H., Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of children’s behavioral engagement in late elementary school: Both teachers and peers matter. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1292. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0039478
Doyle, W. (2013). Ecological approaches to classroom management. In Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. (pp. 107-136). Routledge.
Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1192–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1086/461853
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In Amy L. Reschly, L Christenson Sandra, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Fredricks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M.-T., & Brauer, S. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Teachers College Record, 116(13), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601319
Galton, M., Gray, J., & Rudduck, J. (2003). Transfer and transitions in the middle years of schooling (7-14): Continuities and discontinuities in learning Department for Education and Skills, Research Report RR443. Nottingham: DfES Publications..
Galton, M., Hargreaves, L., Comber, C., & Wall, D. with Pell, A. (1999). Inside the primary classroom: 20 years on. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203161272
Galton, M., Steward, S., Hargreaves, L., Page, C., & Pell, A. (2009). Motivating your secondary class. Sage.
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7
Golding, K. (2021). A study investigating the prevalence, practice and perspectives of the use of internal exclusion in mainstream secondary schools. Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London).
Golley, R., Baines, E., Bassett, P., Wood, L., Pearce, J., & Nelson, M. (2010). School lunch and learning behaviour in primary schools: An intervention study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 64(11), 1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.150
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In Amy L. Reschly, L Christenson Sandra, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_29
Heft, H. (2018). Places: Widening the scope of an ecological approach to perception–action with an emphasis on child development. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2018.1410045
Janosz, M. (2012). Part IV commentary: Outcomes of engagement and engagement as an outcome: Some consensus, divergences, and unanswered questions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 695–703). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_33
Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01060.x
Kindermann, T. A., & Gest, S. D. (2018). The peer group: Linking conceptualizations, theories, and methods. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 84–105). Guilford
Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2012). Will the real peer group please stand up? A" tensegrity" approach to examining the synergistic influences of peer groups and friendship networks on academic development. In A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds), Peer Relations and Adjustment at School. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC.
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing, (2nd Edition) London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315812274
Knifsend, C. A., Espinoza, G., & Juvonen, J. (2022). The role of peer relationships on academic and extracurricular engagement in school. In A.L.Reschly & Christenson (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, (2nd Edition) Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_21
Kutnick, P., & Blatchford, P., with Baines, E., & Tolmie, A. (2013). Effective group work in primary school classrooms: the SPRinG approach. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(1–26). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. Yale University Press.
Ladd, G. W., Herald‐Brown, S. L., & Reiser, M. (2008). Does chronic classroom peer rejection predict the development of children’s classroom participation during the grade school years? Child Development, 79(4), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01172.x
Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., Visconti, K. G., & Ettekal, I. (2012). Classroom peer relations and children’s social and scholastic development: Risk factors and resources. In A. Ryan & G. Ladd (Eds), Peer Relations and Adjustment at School. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC.
Ladd, G. W., & Profilet, S. M. (1996). The Child Behavior Scale: A teacher-report measure of young children’s aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.1008
Lubbers, M. J., Van Der Werf, M. P., Snijders, T. A., Creemers, B. P., & Kuyper, H. (2006). The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005
Martins, J., Cunha, J., Lopes, S., Moreira, T., & Rosário, P. (2022). School engagement in elementary school: A systematic review of 35 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 793–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09642-5
Nuthall, G. (2007). The hidden lives of learners. NZCER Press
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In In Amy L. Reschly, L Christenson Sandra, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pinto, C., Baines, E., & Bakopoulou, I. (2019). The peer relations of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools: The importance of meaningful contact and interaction with peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12262
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In In Amy L. Reschly, L Christenson Sandra, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Jingle, jangle revisted: History and further evolution of the student engagement construct. In A.L.Reschly & Christenson (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, (2nd Edition) Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_1
Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., Tabor, J., Beuhring, T., Sieving, R. E., & Shew, M. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Jama, 278(10), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550100049038
Rogers, L. (2015). Disengagement from Education. London: Trentham Books
Ryan, A. M., North, E. A., & Ferguson, S. (2019). Peers and engagement. In Jennifer A. Fredricks, Amy L. Reschly, & Sandra L. Christenson (Eds), Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions (pp. 73–85). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00006-1
Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics, and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds), Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups (pp. 637–646). New York: Guilford Press.
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0012840
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Amy L. Reschly, L Christenson Sandra, & C. Wylie (Eds), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Skinner, E. A., & Raine, K.E. (2022). Unlocking the positive synergy between engagement and motivation. In A.L.Reschly & Christenson (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, (2nd Edition) Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_2
Symonds, J. E., Kaplan, A., Upadyaya, K., Salmela Aro, K., Torsney, B. M., Skinner, E., & Eccles, J. S. (2024). Momentary student engagement as a dynamic developmental system. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000288
Symonds, J. E., Schreiber, J. B., & Torsney, B. M. (2021). Silver linings and storm clouds: Divergent profiles of student momentary engagement emerge in response to the same task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1192. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000605
Wang, & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
Wang, M.-T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2020). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 5, 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00115-z
Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
Wang, Z., Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. A. (2014). Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 517. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/spq0000050
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68(6), 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132301
Wentzel, K. R., Donlan, A., & Morrison, D. (2012). Peer relationships and social motivational processes. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer Relationships and Adjustment at School (pp. 79–105). Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC.
Wentzel, K. R., Jablansky, S., & Scalise, N. R. (2018). Do friendships afford academic benefits? A meta-analytic study. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1241-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018- 9447-5
Zajac, R. J., & Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as coworkers: Research review and classroom implications. The Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/461881