Learning to change the world Dis/continuity in adolescents’ learning across climate activism and life-wide contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
Feeling the urgency of the climate crisis and judging current societal (re)action insufficient, young adults increasingly engage in climate activism. While individual learning is not the objective of climate activism, research has documented that young adults learn in climate activism movements. This study traces young adults’ learning across climate activism and different life-wide contexts, explicating dis/continuities in learning. Content-analysis of interviews with twelve self-defined climate activists indicates that in and across climate activism and other life-contexts young adults report a) learning about the climate, activism, intersectionality, democracy and system structures, b) learning to organize, socialize and take perspective(s), while c) progressively expressing who and how they want to be(come). Young adults described experiencing discontinuities between the context of their climate activism and other contexts such as education, friends and family, and their efforts to re-establish continuities are an important part of their learning. When young adults experience discontinuity across contexts structurally, they keep their climate activism to themselves and/or disengage from education, among others. Making space in education more explicitly for sharing and shaping what matters to youth seems desirable.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & Oost, H. (2008). Auditing Quality of Research in Social Sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2019). Persons pursuing multiple objects of interest in multiple contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0400-2
Ayres, L., Kavanaugh, K., & Knafl, K. A. (2003). Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006008
Belotti, F., Donato, S., Bussoletti, A., & Comunello, F. (2022). Youth Activism for Climate on and Beyond Social media: Insights from FridaysForFuture-Rome. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072776
Birks, M., Hoare, K., & Mills, J. (2019). Grounded Theory: The FAQs. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 160940691988253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919882535
Biswas, T., & Mattheis, N. (2022). Strikingly educational: A childist perspective on children’s civil disobedience for climate justice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1880390
Bronkhorst, L. H., & Akkerman, S. F. (2016). At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts. Educational Research Review, 19, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001
Bronkhorst, L.H. & Akkerman, S.F. (2023). Chapter 16: Hybridizing in and out-of-school learning. In C. Damsa, A. Rajala, G. Ritella and J. Brower (Eds): Re-theorizing learning and research methods in learning research pp. 259-275. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003205838-17
Bronkhorst, L. H., Koster, B., Meijer, P. C., Woldman, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2014). Exploring student teachers' resistance to teacher education pedagogies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.02.001
Crouzé, R., Godard, L., & Meurs, P. (2023). Learning democracy through activism: the global climate strike movement and Belgian youth’s democratic experience in times of environmental emergency. Social Movement Studies, 23(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2184792
Curnow, J., & Jurow, A. S. (2021). Learning in and for collective action. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880189
Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, P., Ruutu, P., & Tapola-Haapala, M. (2022). The hybridisation of young adults’ worlds as a source of developmental tensions: a study of discursive manifestations of contradictions. Educational Review, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2033704
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Erickson, F. (2021). Waldo, blind inquirers, and an elephant: Locating learning in social movements. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190
Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New directions for youth development, 2002(96), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.25
Kirshner, B. (2007). Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207306065
Hayward, B. (2012). Children, citizenship and environment: Nurturing a democratic imagination in a changing world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203106839
Kirshner, B. (2007). Introduction: Youth activism as a context for learning and development. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207306065
Kluttz, J., & Walter, P. (2018). Conceptualizing learning in the climate justice movement. Adult education quarterly, 68(2), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617751043
Kowasch, M., & Reis, P. G. N. K. K. (2021). Climate Youth Activism Initiatives: Motivations and Aims, and the Potential to Integrate Climate Activism into ESD and Transformative Learning. Sustainability, 13(21), 11581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111581
Kutlaca, M., van Zomeren, M., & Epstude, K. (2020). Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. PloS one, 15(4), e0230918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230918
Malafaia, C. (2022). ‘Missing school isn’t the end of the world (actually, it might prevent it)’: climate activists resisting adult power, repurposing privileges and reframing education. Ethnography and Education, 17(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2022.2123248
Mattheis, N. (2022). Unruly kids? Conceptualizing and defending youth disobedience. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(3), 466-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120918371
Marquardt, J. U. (2020). Fridays for Future’s Disruptive Potential: An Inconvenient Youth Between Moderate and Radical Ideas. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00048
McGimpsey, I., Rousell, D., & Howard, F. (2023). A double bind: youth activism, climate change, and education. Educational Review, 75(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2119021
Merry, M. S. (2020). Can schools teach citizenship? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(1), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1488242
Mitchell, T. D. (2007). Critical service-learning as social justice education: a case study of the Citizen Scholars Program. Equity & Excellence in Education 40(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680701228797
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in development of medical education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
Neas, S. (2023). Narratives and impacts of formal climate education experienced by young climate activists. Environmental Education Research, 29(12), 1832-1848. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12846
Neas, S., Ward, A., & Bowman, B. (2022). Young people's climate activism: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 940876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.940876
O’Brien, K. F. a. R., Selboe, E., & Hayward, B. (2018). Exploring youth activism on climate change: dutiful, disruptive, and dangerous dissent. Ecology and Society, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10287-230342
Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22(3), 224-250. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k
Power, A., Zittoun, T., Akkerman, S., Wagoner, B., Cabra, M., Cornish, F., Hawlina, H., Heasman, B., Mahendran, K., Psaltis, C., Rajala, A. & Gillespie, A. (2023). Social Psychology of and for world-making. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221145756
Rajala, A., Jornet, A.G., & Accioly, I. (2023). Chapter 19: Utopian Methodologies to Address the Social and Ecological Crises Through Educational Research. In C. Damsa, A. Rajala, G. Ritella and J.Brower (Eds): Re-theorizing learning and research methods in learning research pp. 298- 312. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003205838-20
Rowe, T., & Ormond, M. (2023). Holding space for climate justice? Urgency and ‘Regenerative Cultures’ in Extinction Rebellion Netherlands. Geoforum, 146, 103868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103868
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
Schlitz, M. M., Vieten, C., & Miller, E. M. (2010). Worldview transformation and the development of social consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(7-8), 18-36.
Spiteri, J. (2024). Pre-service ECEC teachers’ conceptions of climate change: a community funds of knowledge and identity approach. Education 3-13, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2322999
Uttamchandani, S. (2021). Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ+ youth group’s advocacy efforts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202
Verlie, B., & Flynn, A. (2022). School strike for climate: A reckoning for education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.5
Walker, C. (2020). Uneven solidarity: the school strikes for climate in global and intergenerational perspective. Sustainable Earth, 3, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00024-3
Wansink, B. G. J., Timmer, J., & Bronkhorst, L. H. (2023). Navigating Multiple Perspectives in Discussing Controversial Topics: Boundary Crossing in the Classroom. Education Sciences, 13(9), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090938