Developing Scenarios for Exploring Teacher Agency in Universities: A Multimethod Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Lecturers who are actively engaged in shaping their teaching and teaching practices demonstrate agency. Teacher agency has increasingly been described as a key factor in educational development at universities. Lecturers are expected to innovatively develop courses and continuously improve their teaching practices to respond to, for example, student needs and labor market demands. In this multimethod study, we examined the process of developing and validating scenarios for measuring teacher agency in universities. We conducted four studies to create 23 scenarios that capture the complex nature of teacher agency. First, we interviewed university lecturers to identify bumpy moments in their teaching practice, and so found scenarios based on real-life experiences. Then, we employed two expert panels, to evaluate and refine the scenarios, which enhanced their validity. Finally, we used a pilot study to standardize the data collection procedures. Our multimethod study has established reliability by triangulating methods and researchers, involving multiple stakeholders, and providing detailed descriptions of the research process. This project holds implications for research and practice. The scenarios can be used in professional academic development programs for the collection of research data and to promote self-reflection, peer consultation activities, and professional growth and agency among university lecturers.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Aspbury-Miyanishi, E. (2022). The affordances beyond what one does: Reconceptualizing teacher agency with Heidegger and Ecological Psychology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103662
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons. Biometrika, 39(3/4), 324. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334029
Comproved. (2022, September 5). Assess quick and fair with the Comparing tool - Comproved. https://comproved.com/en/comparing-tool/
Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718-738. http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/cong-lem.pdf
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American journal of sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & psychology, 21(5), 598-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252
Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., & Nummijoki, J. (2015). Double stimulation in everyday work: Critical encounters between home care workers and their elderly clients. Learning, culture and social interaction, 4, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.005
Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008
Ghiasvand, F., Jahanbakhsh, A. A., & Sharifpour, P. (2023). Designing and validating an assessment agency questionnaire for EFL teachers: an ecological perspective. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00255-z
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
Gilpin, L. S., & Liston, D. D. (2009). Transformative Education in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: An analysis of SOTL literature. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030211
Gould, D. (1996). Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5(4), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02766777
Hiver, P., & Whitehead, G. E. K. (2018). Sites of struggle: Classroom practice and the complex dynamic entanglement of language teacher agency and identity. System, 79, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.04.015
Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x
Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2004). The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v11i1.428
Jenkins, G. (2019). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
Jeffries, C., & Maeder, D. W. (2005). Using Vignettes To Build and Assess Teacher Understanding of Instructional Strategies. The Professional Educator, 27, 17–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ728478.pdf
Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778846
Kusters, M., Van der Rijst, R., De Vetten, A., & Admiraal, W. (2023). University lecturers as change agents: How do they perceive their professional agency?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104097
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., & Baucal, A. (2021). Assessing student teachers’ agency and using it for predicting commitment to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1889507
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., & Lepp, L. (2019). TEACHER AGENCY FOLLOWING THE ECOLOGICAL MODEL: HOW IT IS ACHIEVED AND HOW IT COULD BE STRENGTHENED BY DIFFERENT TYPES OF REFLECTION. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1672855
Louws, M., Zwart, R., Zuiker, I., Meijer, P. C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Schaap, H., & Van der Want, A. (2020). Exploring school leaders’ dilemmas in response to tensions related to teacher professional agency. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787203
Luce R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Pollitt A. (2012). Comparative judgement for assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 157-170. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9189-x
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An ecological approach. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of change and Spaces for Manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873x.2012.00588.x
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2013). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9215-8
Romano, M. E. (2006). “Bumpy moments” in teaching: Reflections from practicing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.019
Rushton, E. A., & Bird, A. (2023). Space as a lens for teacher agency: A case study of three beginning teachers in England, UK. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.224
Sannino, A., & Engeström, Y. (2016). Relational agency, double stimulation and the object of activity: An intervention study in a primary school. In Working relationally in and across practices: Cultural-historical approaches to collaboration (pp. 58-77). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275184.004
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. SAGE.
Simon, M., & Tierney, R. (2011). Use of vignettes in educational research on sensitive teaching functions such as assessment. In International congress for school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 1e13) (Limassol, Cyprus). http://www.icsei.net/icsei2011/Full%20Papers/0153.pdf.
Skilling, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2020). Using vignettes in educational research: a framework for vignette construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2019.1704243
Stravakou, P., & Lozgka, E. (2018). Vignettes in Qualitative Educational Research: Investigating Greek school principals’ values. The Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1188–1207. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3358
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Räikkönen, E., & Hökkä, P. (2020). Professional agency in a university context: Academic freedom and fetters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103000
Van Beveren, L., Roets, G., Buysse, A., & Rutten, K. (2018). We all reflect, but why? A systematic review of the purposes of reflection in higher education in social and behavioral sciences. Educational Research Review, 24, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.01.002
Van Kan, C. A., Ponte, P., & Verloop, N. (2010). How to conduct research on the inherent moral significance of teaching: A phenomenological elaboration of the standard repertory grid application. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.007
Verhavert, S., Bouwer, R., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S. (2019). A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(5), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1602027
Verhavert, S., De Maeyer, S., Donche, V., & Coertjens, L. (2018). Scale separation reliability: What does it mean in the context of comparative judgment? Applied Psychological Measurement, 42(6), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621617748321
Yang, H. (2021). Epistemic agency, a double-stimulation, and video-based learning: a formative intervention study in language teacher education. System, 96, 102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102401
Yang, H. (2022). 4 Developing Languages Pre-service Teachers’ Epistemic Agency in Using Technology in Languages Teaching. In D. Banegas, E. Edwards & L. Villacañas de Castro (Ed.), Professional Development through Teacher Research: Stories from Language Teacher Educators (pp. 51-71). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788927727-007