Platformised Affinity Spaces: Learning communities on YouTube, Twitch and TikTok

Main Article Content

Zowi Vermeire
M.J. de Haan
J. Sefton-Green
S.F. Akkerman

Abstract

Online, informal learning communities bring youth opportunities for learning that schools cannot offer. Yet, there are concerns about the impact of social media platforms’ control over online learning. We argue for a re-evaluation of what an ‘online informal learning community’ is by looking at such active communities on three platforms: YouTube, Twitch and TikTok. We do this by reconsidering Gee’s ‘affinity spaces’ and by asking: how can we understand online informal learning communities in the current sociotechnical context? We observed and analysed interactions of six learning communities on YouTube, Twitch and TikTok. Our results show that in today’s platformised online context, Gee’s concept of ‘affinity spaces’ should be reconsidered in three ways. First, platforms call for discussion about affinity spaces’ boundaries through the visibility regimes that play a part in access. Second, platforms challenge the affinity spaces’ grammar; to maintain a focus on their interest, platforms need to engage with interests provided by platform cultures. Third, a more fixated hierarchisation, informed by platforms’ focus on creators, impacts affinity spaces’ social structures. We introduce the concept of ‘platformised affinity space’ as a first step to specific dynamics that platforms introduce to online informal learning communities. We conclude that we only understand these communities when acknowledging how these dynamics are appropriated as well as resisted to achieve community goals.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vermeire, Z., de Haan, M., Sefton-Green, J., & Akkerman, S. (2024). Platformised Affinity Spaces: Learning communities on YouTube, Twitch and TikTok . Frontline Learning Research, 12(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v12i4.1325
Section
Articles

References

Akkerman, S. F., Bakker, A., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Relevance of Educational Research: An Ontological Conceptualization. Educational Researcher, 50(6), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211028239

Akkerman, S., & Leijen, Ä. (2010). Challenges of Today: Maniness, Multivoicedness, and Dispersion of Knowledge. QWERTY, 5(1), 29–43.

Alegre, S. (2021). Protecting Freedom of Thought in the Digital Age. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep33463

Angouri, J. (2015). Online communities and communities of practice. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. Routledge.

Azevedo, F. S. (2012). The Tailored Practice of Hobbies and Its Implication for the Design of Interest- Driven Learning Environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.730082

boyd, danah. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vm5gk

Bronkhorst, L. H., & Akkerman, S. F. (2016). At the boundary of school: Continuity and discontinuity in learning across contexts. Educational Research Review, 19, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.001

Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086

Bucher, T. (2018). If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001

Ceci, L. (2022a, March 15). U.S. YouTube reach by age group 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/296227/us-youtube-reach-age-gender/

Ceci, L. (2022b, April 28). U.S. TikTok users by age 2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095186/tiktok-us-users-age/

Cousin, G. (2005). Learning from Cyberspace. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in Cyberspace (pp. 117–130). Psychology Press.

Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050

Del Valle, M. E., Gruzd, A., Kumar, P., & Gilbert, S. (2020). Learning in the Wild: Understanding Networked Ties in Reddit. In N. B. Dohn, P. Jandrić, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Mobility, Data and Learner Agency in Networked Learning (pp. 51–68). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_4

Deng, L., Connelly, J., & Lau, M. (2016). Interest-driven digital practices of secondary students: Cases of connected learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.004

Dijck, J. van, Poell, T., & Waal, M. de. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From The Age of Mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond Communities of Practice: Language Power and Social Context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012

Goodyear, V. A. (2022). Young People, Social Media and Health: A Pedagogical Perspective on Influencers. In Digital Wellness, Health and Fitness Influencers. Routledge.

Gyldendahl Jensen, C., Clausen, N. R., Dau, S., Bertel, L. B., & Ryberg, T. (2022). Envisioning scenarios in designs for Networked Learning: Networked Learning Conference 2022. Networked Learning 2022. https://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/digitalAssets/1274/1274674_proceedings-for-the-thirteenth-international-conference-on-networked-learning_.pdf

Hasse, C. (2014). An Anthropology of Learning: On Nested Frictions in Cultural Ecologies. Springer.

Hendry, N. A., Hartung, C., & Welch, R. (2022). Health education, social media, and tensions of authenticity in the ‘influencer pedagogy’ of health influencer Ashy Bines. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2006691

Hine, C. M. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277

Hjorth, L., Horst, H. A., Galloway, A., & Bell, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 21-28). Routledge.

Hoekstra, H., Jonker, T., & van der Veer, N. (2022). Nationale Social Media Onderzoek 2022 [Newcom Research & Consultancy B.V.].

Ito, M., Martin, C., Pfister, R. C., Rafalow, M. H., Salen, K., & Wortman, A. (2019). Affinity Online: How Connection and Shared Interest Fuel Learning. NYU Press.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. NYU Press.

Kerssens, N., & Dijck, J. van. (2021). The platformization of primary education in The Netherlands. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1876725

Koopman, C. (2019). How We Became Our Data: A Genealogy of the Informational Person. In How We Became Our Data. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226626611

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching New Literacies: Web 2.0 Practices and Insider Perspectives. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2007.4.3.224

Orlowski, J. (Director). (2020). The Social Dilemma [Documentary-drama]. Netflix.

Paradise, R., & De Haan, M. (2009). Responsibility and reciprocity: Social organization of Mazahua learning practices. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01035.x

Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. SAGE.

Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8358.001.0001

Rehm, M., Littlejohn, A., & Rienties, B. (2018). Does a formal wiki event contribute to the formation of a network of practice? A social capital perspective on the potential for informal learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1324495

Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.

Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Towards platform pedagogies: Why thinking about digital platforms as pedagogic devices might be useful. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1919999

Sefton-Green, J., & Pangrazio, L. (2022). The death of the educative subject? The limits of criticality under datafication. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(12), 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1978072

Twitch. (2021). Twitch.tv |. Twitch Advertising. https://twitch.tv/audience/

Ünlüsoy, A., de Haan, M., Leander, K., & Volker, B. (2013). Learning potential in youth’s online networks: A multilevel approach. Computers & Education, 68, 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.007

Ünlüsoy, A., Leander, K. M., & de Haan, M. (2021). Rethinking sociocultural notions of learning in the digital era: Understanding the affordances of networked platforms. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530211032302. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211032302

Vaessen, M., van den Beemt, A., & de Laat, M. (2014). Networked Professional Learning: Relating the Formal and the Informal. Frontline Learning Research, 2(2), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.92

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wichmand, M., Pischetola, M., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2023). How to Design for the Materialisation of Networked Learning Spaces: A Cross-Case Analysis. In N. B. Dohn, J. Jaldemark, L.-M. Öberg, M. Håkansson Lindqvist, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Sustainable Networked Learning: Individual, Sociological and Design Perspectives (pp. 145–165). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42718-3_9

Williamson, B., Gulson, K. N., Perrotta, C., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Amazon and the New Global Connective Architectures of Education Governance. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.231

Wilson, A., Hamilton, H., Singh, G., & Lockley, P. (2023). Open Is Not Enough: Designing for a Networked Data Commons. In N. B. Dohn, J. Jaldemark, L.-M. Öberg, M. Håkansson Lindqvist, T. Ryberg, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Sustainable Networked Learning: Individual, Sociological and Design Perspectives (pp. 49–66). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42718-3_4

Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Profile Books.