Decomposing the dynamics in time series data with spectral analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Many educational and social phenomena are dynamic and change over time. To study such phenomena, intensive longitudinal data and time-series analyses are essential. Yet such methods remain largely underused in educational sciences, due to their perceived complexity and the dominance of group-level prediction. Complex Dynamic Systems (CDS) perspectives offer promising tools for studying educational phenomena that unfold over time, addressing limitations of traditional nomothetic approaches. CDS emphasises idiographic methods that capture individual, context-dependent processes and within-person change. This paper introduces an accessible approach to CDS research by explaining and illustrating how time-series decomposition with spectral analysis can reveal trends, cycles, and level of synchronisation. By breaking down time-series into interpretable components, researchers can better understand dynamic educational processes and avoid misrepresenting complex phenomena. The current paper illustrates the application of time-series decomposition and spectral analysis with time series data of teacher behaviour, student behaviour, and teacher physiology in four classrooms. The application of time-series analysis is discussed considering the differences in the teachers’ dynamic profiles as well as the potential to study a large variety of other educational topics.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., Morger, V., & Ranellucci, J. (2014). The importance of teachers’ emotions and instructional behavior for their students’ emotions - An experience sampling analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.002
Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge and threat. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 431–445). Psychology Press.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
Cremers, J., Pennings, H. J., & Ley, C. (2020). Regression models for cylindrical data in psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(6), 910-925. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1693332
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8
Dever, D. A., Amon, M. J., Vrzakova, H., Wiedbusch, M. D., Cloude, E. B., & Azevedo, R. (2022). Capturing sequences of learners' self-regulatory interactions with instructional material during game-based learning using auto-recurrence quantification analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 813677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813677
De Vries, H. J., Pennings, H. J. M., Schans, C. P. Van Der, & Sanderman, R. (2023). Wearable-measured sleep and resting Heart Rate Variability as an outcome of and predictor for subjective stress measures: A multiple N-of-1 observational study. Sensors, 23(332), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010332
Donker, M. H. (2020). In DEPTh: Dynamics of Emotional Processes in Teachers – An exploration of teachers’ interpersonal behavior and physiological responses. Utrecht University.
Donker, M. H., Scheepers, D., van Gog, T., van den Hove, M., McIntyre, N., & Mainhard, T. (2023). Handling demanding situations: Associations between teachers’ interpersonal behavior, physiological responses, and emotions. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2249837
Donker, M. H., Van Gog, T., Goetz, T., Roos, A. L., & Mainhard, T. (2020). Associations between teachers’ interpersonal behavior, physiological arousal, and lesson-focused emotions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101906
Donker, M. H., Van Gog, T., & Mainhard, M. T. (2018). A quantitative exploration of two teachers with contrasting emotions: Intra-individual process analyses of physiology and interpersonal behavior. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i3.372
Donker, M. H., Van Vemde, L., Hessen, D. J., van Gog, T., & Mainhard, T. (2021). Observational, student, and teacher perspectives on interpersonal teacher behavior: Shared and unique associations with teacher and student emotions. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101414
Donker, M., van Aken, S., & Mainhard, T. (2023). Using heart rate to tap into motivational and emotional processes during teaching and learning. In Motivation and Emotion in Learning and Teaching across Educational Contexts (pp. 258-273). Routledge.
Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate behavioral research, 53(4), 453-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823
Fox, S. E., Thomas, K. M., Durbin, C. E., Hopwood, C. J., Fox, S. E., Thomas, K. M., Durbin, C. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2021). A variance decomposition of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics. Psychological Assessment, 33, 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000995
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. (2016). Measuring enjoyment, anger, and anxiety during teaching: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.003
Garner, J. K., & D. M. Russell (2016). The symbolic dynamics of visual attention during learning: Exploring the application of Orbital Decomposition. In M. Koopmans, & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex Dynamical Systems in Education: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 345–378). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ghafarpour, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2019). A dynamic systems analysis of classrooms: teacher experience and student motivation. Learning Environments Research, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09293-y
Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Bieg, M., Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., & Hall, N. C. (2015). The glass half empty: How emotional exhaustion affects the state-trait discrepancy in self-reports of teaching emotions. PLoS One, 10(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137441
Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579403000324
Guastello, S. J., Hyde, T., & Odak, M. (1998). Symbolic dynamic patterns of verbal exchange in a creative problem solving group. Nonlinear Dynamics in Psychology and the Life Sciences, 2, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022324210882
Hamaker, E. L. (2012). Why researchers should think “within-person”. A paradigmatic rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43–61). Guilford Publications.
Hasselman, F. (2023). Understanding the complexity of individual developmental pathways: A primer on metaphors, models, and methods to study resilience in development. Development and Psychopathology, 35, 2186–2198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423001281
Hendriks, L., E. Kupers, H. Steenbeek, E. Bisschop Boele, and P. van Geert. 2024. Using state space grids for analysing teacher–student interaction in an intervention: The complex dynamics of teaching for musical creativity. Classroom Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2360421
Hendrickx, M. M., Thurlings, M. C., & Den Brok, P. (2025). Teachers’ collaborative knowledge building in professional learning communities: connecting interaction patterns to learning gains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00938-y
Hollenstein, T. (2011). Twenty years of dynamic systems approaches to development: Significant contributions, challenges, and future directions. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 256–259. https://doi.org/0.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00210.x
Irvine, J. J., & Fraser, J. W. (1998). Warm demanders. Education Week, 17(35), 56–57. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1998/05/13/35irvine.h17.html
Jacobson, M. J. (2020) Complexity Conceptual Perspectives for Research About Educational Complex Systems. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1652138
Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Wang, W., & Huang, Q. (2015). Time series analysis for psychological research: Examining and forecasting change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JUN), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00727
Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2020). Steps for applying the Complex Dynamical Systems approach in educational research: A guide for the perplexed scholar. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1745738
Keller, M. M., Chang, M.-L., Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teachers’ emotional experiences and exhaustion as predictors of emotional labor in the classroom: An experience sampling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1442), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01442
Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. John Wiley & Sons.
Koo, T.K., & Li, M.Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2),155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Koopmans, M. (2016a). Ergodicity and the Merits of the Single Case. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex Dynamical Systems in Education (pp. 119–139). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Koopmans, M. (2016b). Investigating the long memory process in daily high school attendance data. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex Dynamical Systems in Education (pp. 299–321). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Koopmans, M. (2020). Using time series analysis to estimate complex regular cycles in daily high school attendance. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477520500030
Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84, 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to twenty questions about inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852. https://doi.org//10.1177/1094428106296642
Lizdek, I., Sadler, P., Woody, E., Ethier, N., & Malet, G. (2012). Capturing the stream of behavior: A computer-joystick method for coding interpersonal behavior continuously over time. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439312436487
Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., Den Brok, P., & Wubbels, T. (2011). The development of the classroom social climate during the first months of the school year. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.06.002
Mainhard, M. T., Oudman, S., Hornstra, L., Bosker, R. J., & Goetz, T. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.011
Mainhard, M. T., Pennings, H. J. M., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Mapping control and affiliation in teacher-student interaction with State Space Grids. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.008
Marwan, N., Wessel, N., Meyerfeldt, U., Schirdewan, A., & Kurths, J. (2002). Recurrence-plot-based measures of complexity and their application to heart-rate-variability data. Physical Review E, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.026702
Meinecke, A. L., Hemshorn de Sanchez, C. S., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Buengeler, C. (2019). Using state space grids for modeling temporal team dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00863
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford university press.
Murayama, K., Goetz, T., Malmberg, L.-E., Pekrun, R., Tanaka, A., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Within-person analysis in educational psychology: Importance and illustrations. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 12, 71–87.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 2(4), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
Myrtek, M. (2004). Heart and emotion. Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C. A., Van der Want, A. C., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2018). Interpersonal adaptation in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 55, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2017.09.005
Pennings, H. J. M., & Hollenstein, T. (2020). Teacher-student interactions and teacher interpersonal styles: A State Space Grid analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 382–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724
Pennings, H. J. M., Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., Thurlings, M. C. G., & Den Brok, P. (2024). The application of orbital decomposition analysis to study the dynamic quality of teacher–teacher interactions. Classroom Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2398140
Pennings, H. J., & Mainhard, T. (2016). Analyzing teacher–student inter actions with state space grids. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex dynamical systems in education: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 233–271). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
Pennings, H. J. M., Van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., Claessens, L. C. A., Van der Want, A. C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher–student interactions: A Dynamic Systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.016
Roos, A. L., Goetz, T., Krannich, M., Donker, M., Bieleke, M., Caltabiano, A., & Mainhard, T. (2022). Control, anxiety and test performance: Self-reported and physiological indicators of anxiety as mediators. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12536
Ross, J. M., Girard, J. M., Wright, A. G. C., Beeney, J. E., Scott, L. N., Hallquist, M. N., Lazarus, S. A., Stepp, S. D., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2017). Momentary patterns of covariation between specific affects and interpersonal behavior: Linking relationship science and personality assessment. Psychological Assessment, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000338
Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G. R., Duong, D., & Woody, E. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016232
Schaufeli, W. B., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2000). Utrechtse Burnout Scale (UBOS). Testhandleiding. [Utrecht Burnout Scale. Test Manual]. Harcourt Test Services.
Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1307–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902928969
Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2009). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strenghts and weaknesses. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 157–180). Social Indicators Research Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
Seery, M. D. (2011a). Challenge or threat? Cardiovascular indexes of resilience and vulnerability to potential stress in humans. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(7), 1603–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.003
Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis modeling change and event occurance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Trucano, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2014). Enhancing students’ engagement: Report of a 3-year intervention with middle school teachers. American educational research journal, 51(6), 1195-1226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214532515
van der Steen, S. (2014). “How does it work?” A longitudinal microgenetic study on the development of young children’s understanding of scientific concepts.
Van Dijk, A. E., Van Lien, R., Van Eijsden, M., Gemke, R. J. B. J., Vrijkotte, T. G. M., & De Geus, E. J. (2013). Measuring cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity in children. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 74, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3791/50073
Van Heese, T., Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., & Pennings, H. J. M. (2025). Capturing the dynamics of motivating teaching: A real-time observation instrument. Paper presented at the biannual EARLI conference (August 25-29), Graz, Austria.
Warner, R. M. (1998). Spectral analysis of time-series data. The Guilford Press.
Wijnants, M. L., Hasselman, F., Cox, R. F. A., Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. (2012). An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(2), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0067-3
Wilhelm, F. H., & Grossman, P. (2010). Emotions beyond the laboratory: Theoretical fundaments, study design, and analytic strategies for advanced ambulatory assessment. Biological Psychology, 84, 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.017
Wolff, S. M., Hilpert, J. C., Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Strong, C. (2025). Using the fused graphical lasso to explore the motivational self-system after a multimedia self-regulated learning training: a brief research report. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1414563.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., Den Brok, P., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2