Group, team, or something in between? Conceptualising and measuring team entitativity

Article Sidebar

Pdf Html
Published: Oct 16, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.297
Keywords:
team, team entitativity, questionnaire development, Classical Test Theory, Item Response Theory

Main Article Content

Katrien Vangrieken
KU Leuven
Anne Boon
KU Leuven
Filip Dochy
KU Leuven
Eva Kyndt
KU Leuven

Abstract

The main aim of this study includes bridging the gap between strict team and broader group research by describing the distinction between strict teams and mere collections of individuals as the degree of team entitativity or teamness. The concept of entitativity is derived from social psychology research and further developed and integrated in team research. Based upon the entitativity concept and the core team definitions, the defining features shaping teams’ degree of entitativity are determined: shared goals and responsibilities; cohesion (task cohesion and identification); and interdependence (task and outcome). In a next step, a questionnaire is developed to empirically grasp these features. The questionnaire is tested in two waves of data collection (N1=1320; N2=731). Based upon a combination of Classical Test Theory analyses (exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses) and Item Response Theory analyses the questionnaire is developed. The final questionnaire consists of three factors: shared goals and cohesion, task interdependence, and outcome interdependence. Further psychometric analyses include the investigation of validity, longitudinal measurement invariance, and test-retest reliability. This manuscript describes frontline research by: (1) developing a novel conceptualisation bridging groups and teams based upon two research traditions (social psychology and team research) and (2) combining two methodological traditions regarding questionnaire development and validation (Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory).

Article Details

How to Cite
Vangrieken, K., Boon, A., Dochy, F., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Group, team, or something in between? Conceptualising and measuring team entitativity. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.297
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017): Frontline Learning Research
Section
Articles

FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.

References

Albrecht, S. L. (2012). The influence of job, team and organizational level resources on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance: Test of a model. International Journal of Manpower, 33, 840-853. doi: 10.1108/01437721211268357

Aubé, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and, Practice, 9, 189-204. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189

Beersma, B., Homan, A. C., Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 121, 194-203. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.003

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modelling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.

Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H. (1996). The development of group identity in face-to-face and computer-mediated groups with member- ship change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 153–178.

Brewer, M., Hong, Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25-38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Brouwer, P. (2011). Collaboration in teacher teams (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands). Retrieved from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2011-1110-200504/brouwer.pdf

Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). California: Sage Publications Inc.

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25. doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103

Campion, M. A., Medsker, A., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.

Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 107-118. doi:10.1177/104649640003100104

Carpenter,S., Fortune, J.L., Delugach, H.S., Etzkom, L.H., Utley, D.R., Farrington, P.A., & Virani, S. (2008). Studying team shared mental models. In P.J. Ågerfalk, H. Delugach & M. Lind (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the interactive society (pp. 41-48). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1479190.1479197

Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Implications and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.

Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135-143. doi:10.1177/0146167202282001

Cavazza, N., Pagliaro, S., & Guidetti, M. (2014). Antecedents of concern for personal reputation: The role of group entitativity and fear of social exclusion. Basic and Applied Psychology, 36, 365-376. doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.925453

Coertjens, L., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Vanthournout, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Longitudinal measurement invariance of Likert-type learning strategy scales: Are we using the same ruler at each wave? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 577-587. doi:10.1177/0734282912438844

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303

Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Team work engagement: Considering team dynamics for engagement (Working Paper No. 12-06). Retrieved from Business Research Unit website http://bru-unide.iscte.pt/RePEc/pdfs/12-06.pdf

Crawford, M. T., & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfillment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 726-730. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.015

Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1076-1094. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.107

Dasgupti, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003. doi:0022-3514/99/$3.00

Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111-133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). The Job Demands-Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 499-512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 149-167. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009

Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5-18. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999

Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282. doi:10.1037/h0056932

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. J. (2008). Evaluating and improving the quality of teacher collaboration: A field-tested framework for secondary school leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 92, 133–153. doi:10.1177/0192636508320990

Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette, L. H. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 269-313). Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto.

Hackman, J. R. (2012). From causes to conditions in group research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 428-444. doi:10.1002/job.1774

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hamilton, D. L. (2007). Understanding the complexities of group perception: Broadening the domain, 37, 1077-1101. doi:10.1002/ejsp.436

Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.

Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S.J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name – The role of entitativity in group perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 139-166. doi:10.1080/14792772143000049

Henry, K. B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581. doi:10.1177/104649649903000504

Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

Jans, L., Postmes, T., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1130-1141. doi:10.1177/0146167211407342

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287

Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71, 111-120.

Kiggundu, M. N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 145-172. doi:0030-5073/83/020145-28$03.00/0

Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 270-299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.). Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). London: Wiley.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 335-354. doi:10.1002/mde.2552

Kyndt, E., Janssens, I., Coertjens, L., Gijbels, D., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Vocational education students’ generic working life competencies: Developing a self-assessment instrument. Vocations and Learning, 7, 365-392. doi:10.1007/s12186-014-9119-7

Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246. doi:10.1037//0022-3514..78.2.223

Lima, J.A. (2001). Forgetting about friendship: Using conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 97-122. doi:10.1023/A:1017509325276

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press.

Lyubovnikova, J., West, M. A., Dawson, J. F., & Carter, M. R. (2015). 24-Karat or fool’s gold? Consequences of real team and co-acting group membership in healthcare organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 929-950. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.992421

Main, K. (2007). A year-long study of the formation and development of middle school teaching teams (Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Australia). https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/64a6473e-3a2b-f149-bd30-6e2033bbef0f/1/02Whole.pdf

Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.2.273

Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

McLeod, J., & von Treuer, K. (2013). Towards a cohesive theory of cohesion. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3(12), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.thejournalofbusiness.org/

Meneses, R., Ortega, R., Navarro, J., & de Quijano, S. D. (2008). Criteria for assessing the level of group development (LGD) of work groups: Groupness, entitativity, and groupality as theoretical perspectives. Small Group Research, 39, 492-514. doi:10.1177/1046496408319787

Moolenaar, N. M. (2010). Ties with potential: Nature, antecedents, and consequences of social networks in school teams (Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl

Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.

Ohlsson, J. (2013). Team learning: Collective reflection processes in teacher teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25, 296-309. doi:10.1108/JWL-Feb-2012-0011

Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behaviour: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838-844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838

R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.Rproject.org

Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Dochy, F. (2015). An exploratory study of group development and team learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26, 5-30. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21201.

Revelle, W. D. (2012). Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston: Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf.

Rosseel, Y. D. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org.

Rutchik, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 905-921. doi:10.1002/ejsp.555

Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72. doi:0021-9010/93/$3.00

Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Military team research: 10 years of progress. Military Psychology, 7, 55–75.

Salas, E., Burke, C. S., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork: Emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 339-356. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00046

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. doi:10.1002/job.248

semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4-11. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=semTools

Smith, G. (2009). If teams are so good… Science teachers’ conceptions of teams and teamwork (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/31734/1/Gregory_Smith_Thesis.pdf

Somech, A. (2008). Managing conflict in school teams: the impact of task and goal interdependence on conflict management and team effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 359-390. doi:10.1177/0013161X08318957

Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 369-388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369

Sundström, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 44-67. doi:10.1037//1089-2699.4

Svirydzenka, N., Sani, F., & Bennet, M. (2010). Group entitativity and its perceptual antecedents in varieties of groups: A developmental perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 611-624. doi:10.1002/ejsp.761

Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). From “I” to “we”: The factorial validity of a team work engagement scale. In J., Neves, & S.P. Gonçalves (eds.). Occupational Health Psychology: From burnout to well-being (pp. 333-355). Lisboa: alth Psychology.

Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, M., Kirschner, P.A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938

Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. The Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-547. doi:10.2307/20159674

Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 23, 124-143. doi:10.1177/1059601198232003

Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B., & Van de Vliert, E. (1999). Effects of interdependencies in project teams. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 202-214.

Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00033-3

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., & Raes, E. (2016). Team learning in teacher teams: Team entitativity as a bridge between teams-in-theory and teams-in-practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0279-0

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2013). Team entitativity and teacher teams in schools: Towards a typology. Frontline Learning Research, 1, 86-98. doi:10.14786/flr.v1i2.23

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Adminsitrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180. doi:0001-8392/95/4001-0145/$1 .00.

Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciance, 41, 373-398. doi:10.1177/0021886305281984

Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.

West, M. A., & Lyubovnikova, J. (2012). Real teams or pseudo-teams? The changing landscape needs a better map. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 25-55. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01397.X

Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 756-782). Reston, VA and Lanham, MD: Association of Teacher Educators and Rowman.

Yzerbyt, V. Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141-155. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5

Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387-399. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9713865